you are here: > Key Founders of Christianity > Chapter 07
 
Chapter 7-The “universal” church of paganism  
     
1.
 It is one thing to have supremely evil objectives as had Paul and the House of Ananus against Jesus and the House of Joseph.
  
2.
 It is another thing entirely to successfully subvert an intelligent, well funded group such as the Nazarenes.
  
3.
 To do this, each major theological point needed to be subverted to the base architecture of a thinly disguised satanic worship cult worshipping the Mother Goddess and the Lord of Darkness under various names.
 
4.
 The first challenge was how to address the open claim by Jesus to be the true Pharaoh, the Son of God. While virtually no Christians and very few scholars even understand or know that the title Son of God was reserved for the Pharaoh’s of Egypt, two thousand years ago it was as clear as calling a person the President of the United States.
  
5.
 There was no confusing this understanding. So in Jesus saying he was the true Son of God, he was essentially saying in one breath everything written in the Bible concerning Moses is a lie. For the only way Jesus could be the Son of God is if he was somehow the blood descendent of Pharaoh Akhenaten under whose rule all the great plagues and Exodus stories occurred in truth.
  
6.
 Contrary to the modern idea that someone saying they were the Son of God two thousand years ago would be considered blasphemy, it was just a title reserved for the Pharaoh of Egypt and those who had captured Egypt such as the Roman Emperors as well as ancient gods.
 
7.
 Certainly, no one would be stoned for saying something like this. However, they would have been stoned by the Jewish religious hierarchy for the implication of what such a claim meant. This is why Jesus said it.
  
8.
 To the Jewish hierarchy, the title Son of God was a clear and unmistakable challenge to the legitimacy of both their authority and the credibility of the Talmud. For they knew of the great stories concerning the Egyptian Pharaoh and as evidenced in the protesting writings of the great Jewish traitor Josephus, many considered the rumours to be extremely dangerous.
  
9.
 The second challenge to Paul and the Sadducees was how to deal with the whole mythology concerning the miraculous death and resurrection of Jesus.
 
10.
 To the Nazarenes, whether Jesus lived or died after the crucifixion was unimportant compared to the importance of the date on which he was born and was crucified.
 
11.
 To the Nazarenes such as James, the blood brother of Jesus, the most important part was that he was born and crucified on the same day of his birth, the 14 of Nissan on a Great Passover (when 14 Nisan falls on a Friday). That he was the last blood sacrifice and that thereafter no more sacrifices of any flesh and blood by the Israelites should be made.
  
12.
 Considering the bloody history of human sacrifice and demon worship of the Israelites, this symbolism is significant. To the Nazarenes, it was supremely important.
  
13.
 Just as Jeremiah and Baruch had tried to do six hundred years before in writing the first books of the Bible to stop the Israelites performing human sacrifice, cannibalism and terrible drug fuelled orgies to the "Queen of Heaven" and the Lord of Darkness, Jesus was using his own life as the symbolic last human sacrifice.
 
14.
 Both Paul and The House of Ananus also understood this symbolism after the fact. Even though it was Joseph Caiaphas (18-36 CE) the High Priest and key son of the House of Ananus who fell for Jesus’ elaborate suicide plan by encouraging his crucifixion on a Great Passover.
  
15.
 Their strategy for handling the symbolism of his death and his claim for being the Son of God was brilliant.
  
16.
 Instead of rejecting the title Son of God, they made Jesus the literal Son of God. They denounced he was referring to any official title and that those who made such claims were ignorant of the importance and true personality of Jesus.
 
17.
 They openly stated that Jesus was the living Son of God and all the dozens of Sons of God that had come previously were simply previous incarnations.  
18.
 For many major religions of the Day such as Mithraism, Horus cult, Krishna and Attis, the concept of a second coming was part of the religious history. Paul simply stated with his Sadducee helpers that Jesus was not only the fulfilment of Jewish scriptures, but all religious scripture.  
19.
 Like Hesus 2000 years before, Jesus was now the lamb of God. Jesus was the first born of God.
 
20.
 God sacrificed his only child, a blood ritual, a blood sacrifice to the world. In the same manner as Hesus, Attus, Tammuz, Mithra, Krishna, Prometheus, Quetzacoatl and Indra. Only this time, there were witnesses still alive (2,000 years ago).
 
21.
 God sacrificed his only child upon the altar of the cross because he so loved the world and so he could raise him up (like Horus) again on the third day and ascend into heaven to judge the living and the dead. The same as Attis, Tammuz, Krishna, Quetzacoatl and Indra did.
 
22.
 While his birth on the 14 Nisan created a bit of a problem, his death on a Friday 14 Nisan was perfect. The symbolism was unmistakable.
  
23.
 Jesus was no longer just the Jewish messiah, the King of the Jews, he was Messiah to the world.
  
24.
 The fact that jewish history up until that point did not have any historic texts that indicated “God” was going to send his “Son” to Earth to be sacrificed in a ritual killing didn’t matter.
 
25.
 Paul and the Sadducees set about creating a truly universal religion, a Catholic (which in Greek means 'universal') Church of Paganism.  

 
 
 

Copyright © 2010 One-Faith-Of-God.Org. All rights reserved.